Posted on (UTC-4)
2012-07-25 @ 17:17:31
aaannnndddd you reposted it…
2012-07-24 @ 10:44:33
a) If the basis of a philosophy is shifty, then it’s implications are shifty. If you base your life on shifty principles you are a fool. I’m sorry that stupid was too harsh a term for you.
b) Just because you call me friend doesn’t mean I’ll let you get away with saying that matter doesn’t exist. If you’re offended then fuck off. This kind of thing impedes scientific progress.
c) You didn’t even note any of my arguments to back up my original statement. I can only conclude that you have none.
2012-07-24 @ 02:47:22
That’s neither a quote nor filled with misinformation, you daft fool.
2012-07-23 @ 20:38:02
And the majority of people agree that he is wrong.
2012-07-23 @ 16:07:47
What a stupid post…
a) Happiness is caused by chemical reactions (serotonin/dopamine). This post suggests the only genuine happiness comes from success. Therefore drugs don’t make people happy? I’m not advocating drugs, but they completely disprove this point. You can argue that it’s not real happiness or whatever, but chemically it’s the same.
b) Matter doesn’t exist and only an inconceivable energy or force exists? Just because you can’t quantify something now doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Man thought that God was the reason planets moved until Newton invented integral calculus. We can’t assume that just because we don’t know which sub-atomic particle is the smallest, that a smallest one doesn’t exist. That’s called bad science.
c) Your whole idea here is based on the speculation that ‘life is constant suffering’. You base this on *Nothing*. The fact that we have goals is not proof of perpetual suffering. You can’t move the basis of our emotional core down to suffering on the grounds that we are happier when we are successful.
2012-07-21 @ 17:26:19
oh stop crying about it
2012-07-18 @ 18:19:43
a breath of fresh air for hiphop
2012-07-18 @ 02:24:09
“Gerson described his approach in the book A Cancer Therapy: Results of 50 Cases. However, when Gerson’s claims were examined by the National Cancer Institute (NCI), they found that his records lacked the basic information necessary to systematically evaluate his claims.”
2012-07-16 @ 05:12:44
Do you have any evidence to substantiate these claims?
2012-07-03 @ 05:48:17
More stuff like this please :)
2012-05-09 @ 10:48:17
2011-07-07 @ 05:11:57
2011-07-07 @ 05:11:23
Thus far, dream interpretation is strictly theorretical. While I respect your article, phrases like “The major purpose of dreams is to resolve unfinished thoughts left over from the day before” have not yet been proven. While many agree with the Freudian continuation of life theory, it stands with no proof or evidence other than personal experience. In fact large groups of people considered Freud to be an insane cocaine addict, but regardless, just let your readers know this isn’t fact-based before putting it online. Much love Jeremy.