ALL CONCLUSIONS ARE DELUSIONS, ALLUSIONS TO ILLUSIONS.
If you are reading this, it’s most probably because you’re ready.
You’re ready to shed the dense skin of the mind’s dualistic illusions and become an intelligence not bound by the dense mental chains of misunderstood polarity.
Today mankind seems to have a better grip on reality than ever. The apparent manipulative success created by design of the scientific approach has enabled us to speak assured about its findings at least within the language of its applications. However, in the last sixty years or more, science has found qualities of fundamental existence that fully call into question every minutest detail of how we’ve described and created ourselves, our world.
NOTHING IS SEPARATE.
This statement goes farther than one can ever imagine. It is relevant down to the very subatomic particles that make up the molecules of your mitochondria. Everything is still touching. Yet that means that the statement itself is incorrect!, and fails to break the illusion by using its terms. The saying aims to break at your false notions of reality by “fighting fire with fire”, pitting the mind against itself, when in fact this causes more confusion instead of Zen and understanding.
DUALITY: Complimentary but mutually exclusive. Irresolvable contradiction. No true duality exists, but the minds of modern man are filled with such illusions. Modern man lives almost his whole life in such delusion, and is in the dualistic sense disconnected with the heart of reality.
DICHOTOMY: An apparent contradiction that is resolvable by nature of a greater truth that underlies the nature of the seeming contradiction. It can be thought of as a self-resolving paradox. All nature is a dichotomy with a single underlying nature, and that nature is I AM.
The truth is: THAT WHICH IS, IS ALL.
I AM, therefore I Am ALL!
I’m here to speak only of how this ought disassemble and reassemble the mind-frames we use to go about living to more appropriately exemplify reality, enabling us to experience NO cognitive dissonance with actuality.
Some are more obvious, some less so. You may think that you’re familiar with them, but give them a read. You’ll find your understanding is less thorough than you believe and that there’s always room to apply such understanding further in reality.
Here they are, in the order the muse provides:
1. No “nothing”, only everything.
This seems most obvious! Yet, is it? Do you really speak as such? No, you don’t. Here’s why: i.e. “Nothing is there.” Is nothing the thing that is there? How silly. Our words obviously do not reflect reality… but we see the world through the medium of our meanings, there are detriments to our mind’s interface with actuality that result from thinking about it in impossibility. Understanding this simple one will give you the feel for this whole transformation of mind.
All-importantly, this means NOTHING IS UNREAL. How amazing of a sentence that is! It means not only that nothing is not a real thing, but also that something unreal is impossible. Everything is real: if it were not real, it would not be in reality.
Okay, so NOW… read that last paragraph. Instead of seeing the part that says “not only, but also”, see the sentence NOTHING IS UNREAL to mean Both in a sense that is not Both because ‘both’ are two polar perceptive sides of one truth.
If you can understand that and apply it to dualities to transform your perception into dichotomy, you’ll understand this all.
3. No “darkness”, only light.
This follows quite plainly behind the first. There is no darkness, only an experienced relativity between light and without. It’s elementary logic and a commonly known tautology. Yet is it truly realized? No, it is not. One of countless examples- as the day progresses you say “it gets dark.” Is dark the thing that it gets? No. This big rock we’re on blocks the sun’s light in intervals as it cycles. We dualize the apparent polarities of this cycle but it is not so as we call it.
The glory of this Truth can be realized far further than I’ll expound here.
It then follows…
4. No “space”, only stretches between substance.
No “there”, only a great big “here”!
Have you heard Xeno’s Paradox? Like all paradox, it is the result of applying dualistic thought to unified universe. It postulates that if you are always reducing the distance between yourself and something that you will never get to it, because there is always a smaller fraction of interval to shorten. It seems so obviously wrong… yet it’s the result of the very dualistic logic the modern world holds in such high regard.
Consider: Your mind, a product of evolutionary drive onwards, often feels the need to move to a location for any number of reasons. Your location is “here”, and now “that” location becomes “there”. But this is only in your mind! We do not move through the world in intervals the way distance markers are lain on rules or the like. We move with complete fluid unbroken continuity through the Here-ness of the cosmos.
5. No “sound”, no “heat”, only energy.
There is only one energy in the Cosmos. It’s curvy, non-linear nature manifests here as vibration. Through stretching itself out via polarity it makes itself capable of having waves of the single energy interact with others. Wave-interference patterns exist and the geometrical rules of nodes and intervals are inherent. This self-relativity allows the single energy to dissonate with itself. Non-geometrical intervals are disharmonious and do not link. This allows a single infinite spectrum of energy to appear as multiple “energies”. In truth, Gamma is fast visible light, visible light is fast touch, touch is fast heat, heat is fast sound, sound is fast matter, matter is slow energy. It’s all energy at “different” speeds, relativity.
We experience sound due to the range of oscillation our eardrums are capable of touching and resonating. We see visible light due to the range of oscillation our eyes can touch. But these are not ‘separate energies’… hence SYNESTHESIA https://www.highexistence.com/the-one-taste-of-the-universe-or-how-to-experience-synesthesia
6. No time.
This one is confused greatly. The concept of time itself is not a duality, but it is based off of dualities made from other concepts with result from the illusory perception of dualities. This makes it a tough one to up-root.
Our illusion of the passing of time is due to our perception of the passing of substance through space. Without a steady motion of something thru space to use as reference, there is no capability of measuring time.
At that, the sequence of events experienced shifts dramatically as this motion through time progresses. Consider a lightning bolt. When it bolts right above your head, you see the strike and hear it what appears to be simultaneously. Yet in actuality there is a huge perceptive schism in the motion thru space of the light and the sound you experience. This becomes obvious at a distance. A mile away, thunder is heard a full 4.7 “seconds” after the lightning. Experiencing them as if they are separate energies allows us to call them by separate names when in fact they’re a single manifestation of the event, one octave of energy being much lower thus slower than the fast high vibration experienced first.
Relativity in the Einstein sense tells us that our experience of “time” pivots on the relative motion thru space of everything involved. Time is not a reality of its own, but the end-result of illusory perspective brought to mental existence by dualistic thought about relativity.
7. & 8. No “You”, only ME. No “subjective”, only Objective
There are no “others”, only “selves.”
It is the underlying idea of it all, and while most profound and having the greatest impact on our lives, it’s also possibly the easiest to understand. However it may be the most difficult for many people today to apply.
The duality “self” and “other” allows me to bring 7 & 8 into a single explanation.
The illusion that we are “subjective” experiencers of the universe results from feeling as if the cosmos is the “objective” nature that we are “subject” to. This has drawn a false mental barrier between ourselves and the cosmos. Just as there is only Light, only one Energy in existence, that existence must be synonymous with our existence. It is not that we are made-up of that energy but are to be considered separate from it… we ARE that energy! In fact I mean to say we are THIS energy, for there is no “that”.
Consider the “subject” of an action. Although “subject” to the experience, that person is the “object” of their own experience. You cannot find a “subject” of something in the cosmos that is not in and of itself an “object.” Everything’s inherent nature is as its Self, its objective nature. Thus “subjective” is merely a way of looking at something through the dualistic perception of otherness, which may have practical applications in the delusions of human life today, but nonetheless IS NOT REAL.
So, as you are that single all-pervasive Self, that person you despise is also. You dualize them because you’re not willing to accept the truth that they are you. There are parts of them that you are not willing to accept as yourself, therefore you have a conflict with reality, a major foundation for duality, and will experience the illusion of being a separate entity from that being.
It’s easy to see ourselves in those whom we resonate with. But like the tones C and G-flat or the apparent separation of light, heat, sound from a lightning bolt, no degree of experiential dissonance truly gives reality to the mere illusion of separation.
I know so many, I could continue on indefinitely, but these are the ones relevant to all, upon which all delusions of human ‘reality’ are built.
These have obvious and limiteless major implications on the evolution and sustainability of human behaviour as initiated through this correction of erroneous perception.
Fill this thread with dualities that YOU see beyond!
Yeah, as I said in the post, the possible implications of making such an adjustment in oneself and especially as a species are hardly imaginable. Your supposition is probably a wonderful inevitability of an eventuality.
But all I call for is the change we can make today to bring abouts a more enlightened tomorrow.
I hope only to help stimulate a mental shift in people that will bring a careful approach to the expressions of meaning, forever changing for the better the web of meanings we together weave in order to create our world.
Today, this web of meaning is chaotic and made of dualistic conflicts, fears, so forth, all because of a combination of two factors.
1. These perceived dualities. The consistency of the cyclical conditions of human life on earth has allowed for the self-cultivation of such error mindset as if it were logic as could not be refuted. It indeed refutes itself, but this is not seen, because…
2. Most of the people today have an inner world that has been infiltrated by and deluded by the external illusions. Instead, the external world needs be penetrated by and engulfed within the searing light of our awarenesses.
If these two factors change in SOME, you will see within a decade a form of utopia practically build itself, because increasingly such beings are the context that the rest of the world is within. The very existence of a portion of the world in this Light, the simple meanings of its existence on and from a world such as this, will shine a light on the rest of the world that will be impossible to ignore and not learn from.
@mercurial … you’re welcome.
@nightowl, Woah. I have definitely had some of these same thoughts and held most of them true. Now, I see that they truly are. Also, to add to this. We are actually never touching anything. It is simply electrons pulsing together, which then send a signal to yours and my brain that we are “feeling” something. Life is like a simulation, in fact, it very well may be.
@nightowl, Ever heard or read about the Source Field? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nR-klTa1y54&feature=player_embedded#
^There’s a video on it if you would be so inclined to watch it. I haven’t but I have got the audiobook which is the like the above video but 18hours longer. Very eye opening.
Points (1) and (3), people misuse these terms, literally, but figuratively, aren’t they just expressions? “There’s nothing there”… meaning, “Nothing of interest there in regards to whatever the individual deems as important”
…. hrmm… interesting… “… enabling us to experience NO cognitive dissonance with actuality.”
Does misusing the terms as expressions change the reality of how the individuals see them? Is that what you are getting at for those two points?
So basically, we’re all everything simultaneously in a video game where everything is based on dualism for relative understanding of only one thing.
And everything is this one thing that is also nothing. And also both here and there. And also not here and not there.
Nothing is unreal, everything is real,
everything is unreal, nothing is real.
It’s all the same.
Hahaha. Hahaha. So cool.
“Does misusing the terms as expressions change the reality of how the individuals see them? Is that what you are getting at for those two points?”
Yeah, that’s the majority of what I’m getting at there, but I mean it to go a bit further. When we take to something with the entirely wrong thoughts about it, we have a huge fundamental error at the basis of all those thoughts. Whether there appear to be direct consequences or not, having such foundational error about reality will result it decisions within that reality that discord with it.
This discord is what’s being felt all-over the world as the mental illness of our times.
Hrm.. I have my own theories on the causes of mental illness but I do see your point on misusing terms to mean something else and how this can slowly change how you see reality. I guess I never really thought about that way…. what really hit me was the ‘nothing there’ comment, how the expression immediately eliminates any further observation by you or whoever you were saying it to and how this could easily lead to missing something,
I do it all the time,
“Honey, where’s such n such? O? I looked but there was nothing there…O… you found it there… what’re the odds?”
I assigned the term and was done looking, she went and ‘looked harder’, despite my term-ige, and somehow found it in the ‘nothing’…
Nice point, I’ll go through your post again and see if anything else stands out.
@tine, we’re likely referring to “mental illness” differently. I mean all the delusions of general humanity that cause us to be at such dissonance with ourselves as a species as well as with ourselves as a planetary community.
As for your example, seems you’ve got the right idea about what I mean. To clarify further, “Nothing” is not the thing that was found there. No things were found there; Nothing was NOT found there, as nothing isn’t real.
@nightowl, The whole series is just over 14 hours of lecture material. Thank goodness he has a very soothing and entertaining voice.. If you haven’t listened to it all I highly recommend. If you don’t feel like forking out the $20 for it you can always obtain it via torrent or p2p. Though, I was speaking with Mark Watts earlier this week (Alan’s son) and by the sounds of it his organization could really use the support. But nevertheless, do it up if you ever have some time to kill. You won’t be disappointed.
The concept you propose and views you have created are mindblowing and if faced with truth direclty the greatest psycho-shocking blockbuster if the 21th century.
I do think off to that conceptual approach being the foundation of all interaction between the accepting and acceleration of the concept of unified underlaying thinking principles like proposed by Jung or chinese production theories. In a way everything either functions for a function, or it is the function to instil new functions, writing from an abstract aproaoch. Not sure if you get me there.
Solipsism is a good mass explenation wouldn’t you agree?
Bump for it’s-been-a-while relevance!
@spiraltouch, I would agree, but most people can’t understand solipsism properly. As they approach it from dualistic perspectives, they persist that it must mean the ridiculous claim that only “you” actually exist and other people are not “real” because they are not “you.”
@nightowl, it is indeed a proper mindfuck, but seeing it as a concept and leave the attachement and rules as they are and emerge into the chaos is some true coolness.
But if approached with the 2 sides of a coin you’ll have a hard time finding you’re way back I guess ))