Plan| before the plans take over| the natural plans everyone|!

Epiphanitican (@epiphanyaddict) 9 years, 2 months ago

Everyone here seems to have a grandiose approach to the degree of natural order or expressed intent in the ways of nature but all the sudden there arises a problem and it is found to be natures fault. What is my context for nature, natural law ex: that which is living possesses life if anyone ever wishes to educate themselves and defers to me their interest i will simply tell them not to ever approach High Existence as a resource before i give them positive feed back ex: sources they should use what a waste this site turned out to be.
if any of you impulsive hedonist animals have patience: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbi6UZQmJUc

From Reno, to

@epiphanyaddict
, The Venus Project is BASED around resourses, directly. Capitalism is BASED around money, directly. Also, there IS NO resourses behind this money! NONE. NO GOLD NO SILVER, NOTHING! And saying “the way humans naturally proliferate and conduct economic actions” is less valid. lol didn’t humans NATURALLY live in caves way back when. If we were bound to human nature or “the way humans naturally proliferate” we would still be in those caves. Human Nature evolve

First money is a resource and it is performing a role as a medium of exchange. So unless your saying that bater is better which nature evolved towards a medium of exchange such as gold it does not mean that paper is not a resource just because gold is a more effective resource than paper is at being “money”

Secondly “And saying “the way humans naturally proliferate and conduct economic actions” is less valid. lol didn’t humans NATURALLY live in caves way back when.”
my reference to natural is in regards to natural law for example that which is living possesses life so it is not arbitrary you are not regarding context and your attacking a straw man that allegedly stated natural according to your definition. Natural meaning not derived through force when we are referencing economic human actions we must regard whether the actions violate the premises of nature or not such as that which is living possesses life or any other axiom

money is inevitably a resource which is dedicated to the role of facilitating exchanges by being an expressed voluntary natural universal store of value. So what ever becomes money or enters the economic sphere as possessing utility becomes a resource. I understand that making the distinction between gold and silver as resources but their role as goods was mainly as a medium of exchange there is essentially no difference between them in the essence of being money than paper other than that these goods as opposed to paper goods more adequately fulfill the subjective communally imposed requirements for a medium of exchange

if anyting is wong with da post dont go all ad hominem like an unevolved ape kool?

Stop being fucking douche bags on a hippie site

May 13, 2013 at 4:23 pm
Sun=d.o.p.[e] (1) (@Sundop) 9 years, 2 months ago ago

The moment you complain about complaining,
rather complain about yourself than about the complaining hippie douche bags.

[Hidden]
Sun=d.o.p.[e] (1) (@Sundop) 9 years, 2 months ago ago

Nevertheless I admit that the name “Highexistence” is not applicable anymore.

[Hidden]
Epiphanitican (11) (@epiphanyaddict) 9 years, 2 months ago ago

I was not complaining about complaining I am arguing a point a complaint would be the citation that a given aspect of reality is inconvenient an arguement would be the mental or ideological platform is not linear reality atleast in this case this would be accurate. Further more Hippie douchebag is a bit oxymoronic

[Hidden]
Viewing 2 reply threads
load more